Great workshop with Jim Jarvis last Sunday. Did some character release exercises. I created a character based on my PR experience -- tried out a character of a woman that owns her own PR firm. Jim mentioned that Meisner technique played a part in the exercises. When I practiced the character on my own, this PR woman wanted to make the world a better place -- empower her employees -- loved her job and maintained her own power as a boss while empowering those that worked for her -- owned an agency with hardly any turnover (rare in reality). She was upbeat, eccentric and genuinely loved technology (the thing she promoted).
When we did the character release interview where Jim asks your character a series of questions, suddenly this character was forced to reveal many other emotions and it turned out that she merely hid her lonliness behind her work load and under the guise that she was so needed by her employees, she never took care of her own self. Also she was a bit screwed up when it came to love because of this one man that hurt her so badly. So, I felt like the character I brought in with me to class went from happy and quirky to sad really quickly through the series of release questions. It's like he dug under her mask. Interesting. Jim also reminded us that "acting is personal." So true. I don't know, the release exercise was helpful, but I felt like it forced the characters to reveal or perhaps create "issues" and/or "hang-ups." In order to answer his very personal release questions, I (not the character!) simply pulled from one of my own hard past experiences. It's amazing how you can pull these emotions up just by "thinking" of one event in the past. It is my understanding that the Meisner technique does this. I suppose the hope (at least while improvising) is that you have learned from the past in order to handle what emotions come up on stage -- that way, you don't fall into the trap of judging yourself and hence, fall out of character. Certainly not too funny to hear about a character's "hang-ups" (or was it mine, from the past?!?!) but fortunately "trying to be funny" didn't seem to be our main goal. Anyway, good times and definitly interesting.
All the other Sybilites had some really complex and interesting characters. We went overtime 40 minutes and none of us (at least I didn't) even noticed.